Retrieval-Augmented Generation Applications and Development in the Field of Electronic Test Instruments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hff4sx30Keywords:
Retrieval-augmented generation, Electronic test instruments, Knowledge base, Intelligent fault diagnosis, Large language models, Test automationAbstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), especially the fast iteration and widespread deployment of large language models (LLMs), has ushered in a new paradigm for the intelligent augmentation of electronic test instruments and automatic test systems (ATS). By combining the powerful reasoning and generative capabilities of LLMs with the timeliness and accuracy of external knowledge bases, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a highly promising approach to addressing knowledge-intensive challenges in the operation and maintenance of electronic test instruments. This paper presents a comprehensive review of RAG and its applications in the field of electronic test instruments. First, the basic architecture of RAG is reviewed, including retrieval mechanisms, knowledge-base construction, and generative models. Then, considering the operational characteristics of electronic test instruments and automatic test systems, key knowledge-intensive tasks are analyzed, such as fault diagnosis, test configuration, and process planning, followed by a discussion of representative RAG-based applications, including intelligent fault diagnosis systems, adaptive test-parameter configuration, and interactive question-answering assistants. In addition, practical considerations for engineering implementation are discussed with respect to knowledge-base construction and effectiveness evaluation. Finally, open issues and future research directions are outlined, including multimodal RAG, federated learning for distributed knowledge bases, and edge deployment. This review aims to provide researchers and practitioners in relevant industries with a comprehensive understanding of the current status and development prospects of RAG technologies in electronic test instruments.
Downloads
References
[1] Xie, Y., He, K., & Castellanos-Gomez, A. (2025). Toward full autonomous laboratory instrumentation control with large language models. Small Structures, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202500173
[2] Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Qi, L., Wang, P., Wang, X., & Zhao, W. (2026). LLM-enabled multi-agent collaborative instrument control for automated microelectronic testing. Advanced Devices & Instrumentation, 7, 0202. https://spj.science.org/doi/10.34133/adi.0202
[3] Peykani, P., Ramezanlou, F., Tanasescu, C., & Ghanidel, S. (2025). Large language models: A structured taxonomy and review of challenges, limitations, solutions, and future directions. Applied Sciences, 15(14), 8103. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148103
[4] Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Kuttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W., Rocktaschel, T., Riedel, S., & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.11401
[5] Karpukhin, V., Oguz, B., Min, S., Lewis, P., Wu, L., Edunov, S., Chen, D., & Yih, W. (2020). Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 6769–6781. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550
[6] Trivedi, H., Balasubramanian, N., Khot, T., & Sabharwal, A. (2023). Interleaving retrieval with chain-of-thought reasoning for knowledge-intensive multi-step questions. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 1, 10014–10037. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.557
[7] Robertson, S., & Zaragoza, H. (2009). The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3(4), 333–389. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000019
[8] Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-networks. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), 3982–3992. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d19-1410
[9] Cormack, G. V., Clarke, C. L. A., & Buettcher, S. (2009). Reciprocal rank fusion outperforms Condorcet and individual rank learning methods. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 758–759. https://doi.org/10.1145/1571941.1572114
[10] Liu, P., Qian, L., Zhao, X., & Tao, B. (2024). Joint knowledge graph and large language model for fault diagnosis and its application in aviation assembly. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 20(6), 8160–8169. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2024.3366977
[11] Mao, K., Liu, Z., Qian, H., Mo, F., Deng, C., & Dou, Z. (2024). RAG-Studio: Towards in-domain adaptation of retrieval augmented generation through self-alignment. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, 725–735. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.41
[12] Asai, A., Wu, Z., Wang, Y., Sil, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2024). Self-RAG: Learning to retrieve, generate, and critique through self-reflection. ICLR 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2310.11511
[13] Liu, P., Qian, L., Zhao, X., & Tao, B. (2024). Joint knowledge graph and large language model for fault diagnosis and its application in aviation assembly. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 20(6), 8160–8169. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2024.3366977
[14] Mo, F., Mao, K., Zhao, Z., Qian, H., Chen, H., Cheng, Y., Li, X., Zhu, Y., Dou, Z., & Nie, J. (2025). A survey of conversational search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 43(6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3759453
[15] Picariello, F., Daponte, P., Vito, L., & Tudosa, I. (2026). AI-supported remote laboratories for measurement education: A preliminary evaluation of LLM for oscilloscope-based training. 2026 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 40 & IoT (MetroInd40 & IoT), 662–667. https://doi.org/10.1109/metroind4.0iot69397.2026.11653169
[16] Huang, L., Cui, Q., Yu, L., & Dai, J. (2026). Dynamic knowledge graph construction from multi-source heterogeneous data for RAG-based vertical domain question answering. 2026 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things and Cloud Computing Technology (AIoTC), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/aiotc71250.2026.11688541
[17] Siddharth, L., & Luo, J. (2024). Retrieval augmented generation using engineering design knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems, 303, 112410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112410
[18] Mattos, E., Nascimento, E., Amoedo, D., Guimarães, V., Matias, P., Oliveira, E., Naja, L., Castro, M., Oliveira, P., Uchoa, M., Maia, C., Botinelly, L., Brito, R., Cardoso, B., Leite, L., Pessoa, L., Pires, A., Miranda, A., Pimentel, A., Belém, R., Fabricio, R., Carvalho, C., & Júnior, W. (2026). Chunking strategies in RAG pipelines: Evaluating the impact on LLM response quality using consumer electronics user manuals. 2026 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icce67443.2026.11449886
[19] Chen, X., Jia, S., & Xiang, Y. (2020). A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph. Expert Systems with Applications, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948
[20] Yang, R., Wong, M., Li, H., Li, X., Zhu, W., Liao, J., Yu, K., Liew, J., Xuan, W., Chen, Y., Ke, Y., Ong, J., Teodoro, D., Hong, C., Ting, D., & Liu, N. (2026). Retrieval-augmented generation in medicine: A scoping review of technical implementations, clinical applications, and ethical considerations. Cell Reports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102927
[21] Li, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, W., Hung, K., Xie, H., & Wang, F. (2025). Retrieval-augmented generation for educational application: A systematic survey. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100417
[22] Brown, A., Roman, M., & Devereux, B. (2025). A systematic literature review of retrieval-augmented generation: Techniques, metrics, and challenges. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 9(12), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9120320
[23] Wang, R., Wang, J., Huang, Y., Guo, H., & Pang, J. (2026). A survey on medical multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). High-Confidence Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcc.2026.100415
[24] Nandhakumar, K. P., & Sasikala, E. (2026). Intelligent ERP AI agent with RAG and LLM integration: A systematic literature review. 2026 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications (AIMLA), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMLA67915.2026.11522318
[25] Lambert, B., Forbes, F., Doyle, S., Dehaene, H., & Dojat, M. (2024). Trustworthy clinical AI solutions: A unified review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning models for medical image analysis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 150, 102830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102830
[26] Zhao, W., Yang, X., Lyu, Z., Xu, C., & Guan, Z. (2025). Road of large language model: Source, challenge, and future perspectives. Research, 8, 0655. https://doi.org/10.34133/research.0655
[27] Bianchini, F., Bianchini, E., Wyon-Boyault, C., Folco, E., Proponnet-Guerault, M., Vuillerme, N., & Mecella, M. (2026). Quantized medical LLMs for edge deployment: A privacy-preserving RAG system. 2026 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI), 622–628. https://doi.org/10.1109/cai68641.2026.11536204
[28] Lamaakal, I., Maleh, Y., Makkaoui, K., Ouahbi, I., Plawiak, P., Alfarraj, O., Almousa, M., & El-Latif, A. (2025). Tiny language models for automation and control: Overview, potential applications, and future research directions. Sensors, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051318
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
