Explainable Relation-Heterogeneous Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Supply Chain Disruption Onset Prediction

Authors

  • Jason K. H. Lau Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
  • Chloe Y. T. Cheng Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
  • Marcus W. L. Ho Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/trzyex55

Keywords:

Supply chain disruption, heterogeneous temporal graph, graph neural network, explainable AI, ripple effect, risk propagation

Abstract

Supply-chain disruption prediction is structurally different from ordinary time-series forecasting because risk is transmitted through typed dependencies such as sourcing, transportation, distribution, and alternate-supply relations. We present RHET-GNN, a relation-heterogeneous temporal graph neural network that couples a per-entity GRU encoder with directed, relation-specific, dependency-weighted graph attention. The same normalized attention coefficients provide an intrinsic explanation over incoming typed edges, allowing a predicted onset to be decomposed by supplier and relation without invoking a separate post-hoc explainer. Because publicly available supply-chain benchmarks such as SupplyGraph support planning tasks but do not provide event-level ground-truth disruption-propagation paths, we evaluate on a fully reproducible four-type, four-relation synthetic testbed whose causal edge contributions are logged by construction. No experimental values are manually specified: all reported metrics are produced by the accompanying code. Across three independently generated seeds, RHET-GNN obtains onset AUC 0.723±0.010, AP 0.252±0.006, and F1 0.325±0.007. Relative to a temporal-only GRU, AP improves by 79.0%. Relative to a relation-agnostic temporal graph-attention baseline, predictive AP is similar (+0.9% relative), while explanation precision@1 improves by 4.4 percentage points and NDCG by 2.5 points. These results indicate that graph structure drives most of the predictive gain, whereas explicit relation typing is especially valuable for attribution quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ren, S., Jin, J., Niu, G., & Liu, Y. (2025). ARCS: Adaptive reinforcement learning framework for automated cybersecurity incident response strategy optimization. Applied Sciences, 15(2), 951.

[2] Li, P., Ren, S., Zhang, Q., Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2024). Think4SCND: Reinforcement learning with thinking model for dynamic supply chain network design. IEEE Access, 12, 195974–195985.

[3] Hu, X., Zhao, X., Wang, J., & Yang, Y. (2025). Information theoretic multi scale geometric pre training for enhanced molecular property prediction. PLOS ONE, 20(10), e0332640.

[4] Wang, M., Zhang, X., Yang, Y., & Wang, J. (2025). Explainable machine learning in risk management: Balancing accuracy and interpretability. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 14(3), 185–198.

[5] Zhang, H. (2024). Graph aware multi task learning for early prediction of timing violations and routing congestion in digital IC physical design. World Journal of Information Technology, 2(1), 13–20.

[6] Wang, J., Tan, Y., Jiang, B., Wu, B., & Liu, W. (2025). Dynamic marketing uplift modeling: A symmetry preserving framework integrating causal forests with deep reinforcement learning for personalized intervention strategies. Symmetry, 17(4), 610.

[7] Zhao, X., Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2026). CryptoMamba SSM: Linear complexity state space models for cryptocurrency volatility prediction. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 7, 226–243.

[8] Wang, J., Liu, J., Zheng, W., & Ge, Y. (2025). Temporal heterogeneous graph contrastive learning for fraud detection in credit card transactions. IEEE Access.

[9] Sun, T., Yang, J., Li, J., Chen, J., Liu, M., Fan, L., & Wang, X. (2024). Enhancing auto insurance risk evaluation with transformer and SHAP. IEEE Access, 12, 116546–116557.

[10] Zhang, H. (2025). Reinforcement learning approaches for layout optimization in electronic design automation with electromagnetic compatibility constraints. Frontiers in Robotics and Automation, 2(2), 77–93.

[11] Chen, Z., Liu, J., & Chen, J. (2025). Machine learning methods for financial forecasting in enterprise planning: Transitioning from rule based models to predictive analytics. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Research, 2(3), 541–564.

[12] Chen, J., Liu, J., Liang, Y., & Zhou, M. (2026). KE MLLM: A knowledge enhanced multi sensor learning framework for explainable fake review detection. Applied Sciences, 16(6), 2909.

[13] Yue, X., Yang, J., & Liu, W. (2026). FraudDebate Agent: A multi agent LLM framework with an evidence based debate mechanism for financial statement fraud detection. Mathematics, 14(15), 2695.

[14] Zhu, R., & Yue, X. (2024). An explainable machine learning framework for predicting dividend sustainability and financial risk of U.S. REITs under interest rate shocks. Journal of Trends in Finance and Economics, 1(2), 48–57.

[15] Han, X., Yang, Y., Chen, J., Wang, M., & Zhou, M. (2025). Symmetry aware credit risk modeling: A deep learning framework exploiting financial data balance and invariance. Symmetry, 17(3), 341.

[16] Chen, J., Cui, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, J., & Zhou, M. (2024). Temporal convolutional network for carbon tax projection: A data driven approach. Applied Sciences, 14(20), 9213.

[17] Sun, T., Wang, M., & Chen, J. (2025). Leveraging machine learning for tax fraud detection and risk scoring in corporate filings. Asian Business Research Journal, 10(11), 1–13.

[18] Chen, J., Wang, M., & Sun, T. (2025). Intelligent tax systems and the role of natural language processing in regulatory interpretation. American Journal of Machine Learning, 6(4), 74–94.

[19] Yue, X., & Zhu, R. (2024). An explainable hybrid machine learning framework for cash flow conditioned multi horizon liquidity risk early warning: An SME oriented benchmark study. World Journal of Management Science, 2(1), 63–72.

[20] Zi, B. (2024). Cloud native distributed systems for real time payment intelligence. AI and Data Science Journal, 1(1), 51–56.

[21] Zhang, S., & Qiu, L. (2023). An interpretable, uncertainty aware framework for bridge deterioration prediction and risk based maintenance prioritization. Academic Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 1(2), 21–28.

[22] Jin, J., Xing, S., Ji, E., & Liu, W. (2025). Xgate: Explainable reinforcement learning for transparent and trustworthy API traffic management in IoT sensor networks. Sensors, 25(7), 2183.

[23] Xing, S., Wang, Y., & Liu, W. (2025). Multi dimensional anomaly detection and fault localization in microservice architectures: A dual channel deep learning approach with causal inference for intelligent sensing. Sensors, 25(11), 3396.

[24] Xing, S., & Wang, Y. (2025). Proactive data placement in heterogeneous storage systems via predictive multi objective reinforcement learning. IEEE Access, 13, 117986–117998.

[25] Ji, E., Wang, Y., Xing, S., & Jin, J. (2025). Hierarchical reinforcement learning for energy efficient API traffic optimization in large scale advertising systems. IEEE Access.

[26] Xing, S., & Wang, Y. (2025). Cross modal attention networks for multi modal anomaly detection in system software. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society.

[27] Liu, Y., Ren, S., Wang, X., & Zhou, M. (2024). Temporal logical attention network for log based anomaly detection in distributed systems. Sensors, 24(24), 7949.

[28] Yang, J., Li, P., Cui, Y., Han, X., & Zhou, M. (2025). Multi sensor temporal fusion transformer for stock performance prediction: An adaptive Sharpe ratio approach. Sensors, 25(3), 976.

[29] Zhao, X., Sun, T., Ren, S., Yang, J., & Liu, Y. (2025). RAG Based AI Agents for Enterprise Software Development: Implementation Patterns and Production Deployment. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Research, 2(3), 501–520.

[30] Sun, T., Wang, M., & Chen, J. (2025). Leveraging machine learning for tax fraud detection and risk scoring in corporate filings. Asian Business Research Journal, 10(11), 1–13.

[31] Bian, M., Li, P., Lin, Y., Wang, Y., & Teng, D. (2026). Assessing green public supply chains resilience under carbon neutrality goals: A multi agent reinforcement learning framework. IEEE Access.

[32] Teng, D. (2025). TEAS: Token and energy aware autoscaling for cost efficient LLM serving. AI and Data Science Journal, 6(3), 1–10.

[33] Rhee, M., Zou, J., Mo, T., Teng, D., & Yang, J. S. (2026). Enhancing web search agents with self play contrastive fine tuning. IEEE Access.

[34] Wang, B., Zhao, W., & Wang, Z. (2024). DAS GNN: A scalable disagreement aware graph neural framework for anomaly detection in large scale networks. AI and Data Science Journal, 1(1), 67–75.

[35] Wang, Z., & Shen, Z. (2024). Flex Talent: An explainable and fair machine learning framework for high stakes leadership pipeline evaluation. World Journal of Management Science, 2(1), 73–82.

[36] Guo, Z., Chen, T., & Shang, W. (2022). Class conditional intermediate domain adversarial adaptation for cross device acoustic scene classification. Journal of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 4(1), 26–35.

[37] Wang, Y., Bian, M., & Lin, Y. (2022). An explainable temporal graph neural network for disruption prediction and risk propagation in multi tier supply chains. Journal of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 4(1), 17–25.

[38] Zhao, W., & Wang, B. (2022). CAPA: A prediction driven autoscaling framework for SLO aware cloud native machine learning inference. Journal of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 4(1), 8–16.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Lau, J. K. H., Cheng, C. Y. T., & Ho, M. W. L. (2026). Explainable Relation-Heterogeneous Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Supply Chain Disruption Onset Prediction. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology Research, 3(2), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.54097/trzyex55