Comparative Assessment of Carbon Nanotube and Steel Fiber Reinforcement in Recycled Aggregate Shotcrete

Authors

  • Yakun Kang School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/z18t6e39

Keywords:

Recycled aggregate shotcrete, carbon nanotubes, steel fibers, interfacial transition zone, tensile behaviour, multi-scale reinforcement, mix design

Abstract

Recycled coarse aggregate shotcrete (RCAS) offers a resource-efficient route for underground support, but adhered mortar, heterogeneous interfaces and brittle crack propagation limit its mechanical reliability. This study critically integrates two independent experimental investigations of multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and steel-fiber (SF) modification to evaluate the complementary roles of matrix-scale densification and crack-scale bridging. The original experimental conditions are preserved while comparable strength, deformation, pore-structure and tensile-energy indicators are examined. In the MWCNT-modified mixtures, a dosage of 0.06 wt% yielded the highest reported 28 d compressive strength (38.25 MPa), whereas 0.09 wt% maximized the splitting-tensile (3.95 MPa) and flexural (4.88 MPa) strengths. Higher dosages reduced performance as dispersion deteriorated. In the separate SF-reinforced series, increasing recycled aggregate replacement from 0% to 100% reduced direct-tensile strength from 2.6 to 2.2 MPa, whereas increasing fiber content from 0% to 2% at 50% replacement increased tensile strength from 1.5 to 3.3 MPa. Together, these observations distinguish nano-scale hydration and pore refinement from fiber-mediated stress transfer after cracking. A mechanism-based reinforcement framework is proposed to balance constructability, strength, ductility and energy absorption. Because the two experimental programs differ in aggregate quality, mixture design and test conditions, combined MWCNT–SF effects remain a hypothesis requiring dedicated experimental validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li, P., Chen, L., Ma, H., et al. (2023). Spatial distribution characteristics and microscopic mechanisms for enhancing mechanical properties of MWCNTs in recycled coarse aggregate shotcrete. Construction and Building Materials, 364, 129927.

[2] Zhang, X., Ma, C., Liu, C., et al. (2024). Uniaxial tensile properties of steel fiber-reinforced recycled coarse aggregate shotcrete: Test and constitutive relationship. Construction and Building Materials, 411, 134202.

[3] Standardization Administration of China. (2010). Recycled Coarse Aggregate for Concrete: GB/T 25177—2010. Beijing.

[4] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. (2019). Standard for Test Methods of Concrete Physical and Mechanical Properties: GB/T 50081—2019. China Architecture & Building Press.

[5] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. (2015). Technical Code for Engineering of Ground Anchorages and Shotcrete Support: GB 50086—2015. China Planning Press.

[6] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. (2016). Standard for Test Method of Performance on Ordinary Fresh Concrete: GB/T 50080—2016. China Architecture & Building Press.

[7] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. (2016). Technical Specification for Application of Sprayed Concrete: JGJ/T 372—2016. China Architecture & Building Press.

[8] China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization. (2009). Standard Test Methods for Fiber Reinforced Concrete: CECS 13:2009. Beijing.

[9] Ministry of Water Resources of China. (2020). Test Code for Hydraulic Concrete: SL/T 352—2020. Beijing.

[10] Duarte, G., Bravo, M., de Brito, J., et al. (2019). Mechanical performance of shotcrete produced with recycled coarse aggregates from concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 210, 696–708.

[11] Nobre, J., Bravo, M., de Brito, J., et al. (2020). Durability performance of dry-mix shotcrete produced with coarse recycled concrete aggregates. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101135.

[12] Tam, V. W. Y., Soomro, M., & Evangelista, A. C. J. (2018). A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications (2000–2017). Construction and Building Materials, 172, 272–292.

[13] Saez del Bosque, I. F., Zhu, W., Howind, T., et al. (2017). Properties of interfacial transition zones (ITZs) in concrete containing recycled mixed aggregate. Cement and Concrete Composites, 81, 25–34.

[14] Konsta-Gdoutos, M. S., Metaxa, Z. S., & Shah, S. P. (2010). Highly dispersed carbon nanotube reinforced cement based materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 40(7), 1052–1059.

[15] Sobolkina, A., Mechtcherine, V., Khavrus, V., et al. (2012). Dispersion of carbon nanotubes and its influence on the mechanical properties of the cement matrix. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(10), 1104–1113.

[16] Shi, X., Park, P., Rew, Y., et al. (2020). Constitutive behaviors of steel fiber reinforced concrete under uniaxial compression and tension. Construction and Building Materials, 233, 117316.

[17] Guler, S., Oker, B., & Akbulut, Z. F. (2021). Workability, strength and toughness properties of different types of fiber-reinforced wet-mix shotcrete. Structures, 31, 781–791.

[18] Wang, B., Yan, L., Fu, Q., et al. (2021). A comprehensive review on recycled aggregate and recycled aggregate concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 171, 105565.

[19] Le Hoang, A., & Fehling, E. (2017). Influence of steel fiber content and aspect ratio on the uniaxial tensile and compressive behavior of ultra high performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 153, 790–806.

[20] Ren, Q., Pacheco, J., de Brito, J., et al. (2024). Analysis of the influence of the attached mortar’s geometry on the mechanical behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete through mesoscale modelling. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 297, 109876.

[21] Chen, Q., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2024). A review of the interfacial transition zones in concrete: Identification, physical characteristics, and mechanical properties. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 300, 109979.

[22] Guo, S., Ding, Y., Zhang, X., et al. (2024). Tensile properties of steel fiber reinforced recycled concrete under bending and uniaxial tensile tests. Journal of Building Engineering, 96, 110467.

[23] Ren, Q., Pacheco, J., & de Brito, J. (2024). Mesoscale modelling of recycled aggregate concrete: A parametric analysis of properties of mesoscopic phases of RAC. Journal of Cleaner Production, 478, 143967.

[24] Zhang, J., Chen, S., Gu, F., et al. (2025). Multi-scale reinforcing effect of steel-PVA fibers and carbon nanotubes on fully recycled aggregate concrete: Mechanical properties and microstructures. Journal of Building Engineering, 113, 114067.

[25] Wang, C., Yuan, J., Lu, B., et al. (2024). New insights into the mechanical behavior and enhancement mechanism of micro-steel-fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete through in-situ 4D CT analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 438, 137111.

[26] Wang, S., Qu, Y., Li, J., et al. (2025). Interfacial bonding properties between steel fiber and cement paste containing SiO₂ nanoparticles: Experimental and numerical investigation. Construction and Building Materials, 499, 144018.

[27] Cui, X., Chen, M., Feng, J., et al. (2025). Effect of cryogenic temperature on compressive and splitting tensile behaviour of industrial-recycled hybrid steel fiber reinforced ultra-high performance shotcrete. Construction and Building Materials, 479, 141445.

[28] Wang, F., & Gao, D. (2023). Tensile behavior analysis and prediction of steel fiber recycled fine aggregate concrete. Structures, 55, 2232–2248.

[29] Tang, Y., Xiao, J., Zhang, H., et al. (2022). Mechanical properties and uniaxial compressive stress-strain behavior of fully recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 323, 126546.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kang, Y. (2026). Comparative Assessment of Carbon Nanotube and Steel Fiber Reinforcement in Recycled Aggregate Shotcrete. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology Research, 3(3), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.54097/z18t6e39