Effects of Shading Strategy on daylight illuminance and energy consumption for southern facades of Office Buildings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/cbhbmf53Keywords:
Shading strategy, daylight illuminance, energy consumption, office building, eQUEST, southern façadeAbstract
This study investigates the effects of exterior shading strategies on annual average daylight illuminance and electricity consumption for the southern façade of a two-story office building in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Using eQUEST, four cases were simulated: a baseline without shading, horizontal overhangs only, vertical fins only, and a combination of overhangs and fins. The results show that all shading configurations reduce electricity consumption compared with the baseline, while horizontal overhangs perform more effectively than vertical fins. The combined strategy achieves the lowest annual electricity consumption and the largest reduction in daylight illuminance. However, excessive shading also reduces the hours during which daylight illuminance remains above the setpoint, increasing electric lighting demand and limiting additional energy savings. The findings indicate that shading design should balance solar heat-gain reduction and daylight availability, with parameters adjusted according to climate, orientation, material, and building conditions.
Downloads
References
[1] Alshamrani, O., & Mujeebuu, M. A. (2016). Effects of shading strategy and orientation on energy performance of school building. *Journal Architecture & Planning*, *28*(1), 129–141.
[2] Alzoubi, H. H., & Al‑Zoubi, A. H. (2010). Assessment of building façade performance in terms of daylighting and the associated energy consumption in architectural spaces: Vertical and horizontal shading devices for southern exposure facades. *Energy Conversion and Management*, *51*, 1592–1599.
[3] Farah, Y. (2013). *The effect of shading devices on the energy consumption of buildings: A study on an office building in Dubai*. The British University in Dubai (BUiD).
[4] Athienitis, A. K., & Tzempelikos, A. (2002). A methodology for simulation of daylight room illuminance distribution and light dimming for a room with controlled shading device. *Solar Energy*, *72*(4), 271–281.
[5] Yao, J., & Yan, C. (2011). Evaluation of the energy performance of shading devices based on incremental costs. *World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology*, *5*(5), 394–396.
[6] Ye, Y., Xu, P., Mao, J., & Ji, Y. (n.d.). Experimental study on the effectiveness.
[7] Wikipedia contributors. (2018, December 21). *Ann Arbor, Michigan*. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ann_Arbor,_Michigan&oldid=874518235
[8] U.S. Department of Energy. (n.d.). *eQUEST … the QUick Energy Simulation Tool*. http://www.doe2.com/download/equest/eQUESTv3‑Overview.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










